@article {142, title = {Identification of rare and common regulatory variants in pluripotent cells using population-scale transcriptomics.}, journal = {Nat Genet}, volume = {53}, year = {2021}, month = {2021 03}, pages = {313-321}, abstract = {

Induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) are an established cellular system to study the impact of genetic variants in derived cell types and developmental contexts. However, in their pluripotent state, the disease impact of genetic variants is less well known. Here, we integrate data from 1,367 human iPSC lines to comprehensively map common and rare regulatory variants in human pluripotent cells. Using this population-scale resource, we report hundreds of new colocalization events for human traits specific to iPSCs, and find increased power to identify rare regulatory variants compared with somatic tissues. Finally, we demonstrate how iPSCs enable the identification of causal genes for rare diseases.

}, keywords = {Bardet-Biedl Syndrome, Calcium Channels, Cell Line, Cerebellar Ataxia, DNA Methylation, Gene Expression, Genetic Variation, Humans, Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Proteins, Quantitative Trait Loci, Rare Diseases, Regulatory Sequences, Nucleic Acid, Sequence Analysis, RNA, Whole Genome Sequencing}, issn = {1546-1718}, doi = {10.1038/s41588-021-00800-7}, author = {Bonder, Marc Jan and Smail, Craig and Gloudemans, Michael J and Fr{\'e}sard, Laure and Jakubosky, David and D{\textquoteright}Antonio, Matteo and Li, Xin and Ferraro, Nicole M and Carcamo-Orive, Ivan and Mirauta, Bogdan and Seaton, Daniel D and Cai, Na and Vakili, Dara and Horta, Danilo and Zhao, Chunli and Zastrow, Diane B and Bonner, Devon E and Wheeler, Matthew T and Kilpinen, Helena and Knowles, Joshua W and Smith, Erin N and Frazer, Kelly A and Montgomery, Stephen B and Stegle, Oliver} } @article {143, title = {Population-scale tissue transcriptomics maps long non-coding RNAs to complex disease.}, journal = {Cell}, volume = {184}, year = {2021}, month = {2021 05 13}, pages = {2633-2648.e19}, abstract = {

Long non-coding RNA (lncRNA) genes have well-established and important impacts on molecular and cellular functions. However, among the thousands of lncRNA genes, it is still a major challenge to identify the subset with disease or trait relevance. To systematically characterize these lncRNA genes, we used Genotype Tissue Expression (GTEx) project v8 genetic and multi-tissue transcriptomic data to profile the expression, genetic regulation, cellular contexts, and trait associations of 14,100 lncRNA genes across 49 tissues for 101 distinct complex genetic traits. Using these approaches, we identified 1,432 lncRNA gene-trait associations, 800 of which were not explained by stronger effects of neighboring protein-coding genes. This included associations between lncRNA quantitative trait loci and inflammatory bowel disease, type 1 and type 2 diabetes, and coronary artery disease, as well as rare variant associations to body mass index.

}, keywords = {Coronary Artery Disease, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Disease, Gene Expression Profiling, Genetic Variation, Humans, Inflammatory Bowel Diseases, Multifactorial Inheritance, Organ Specificity, Population, Quantitative Trait Loci, RNA, Long Noncoding, Transcriptome}, issn = {1097-4172}, doi = {10.1016/j.cell.2021.03.050}, author = {de Goede, Olivia M and Nachun, Daniel C and Ferraro, Nicole M and Gloudemans, Michael J and Rao, Abhiram S and Smail, Craig and Eulalio, Tiffany Y and Aguet, Francois and Ng, Bernard and Xu, Jishu and Barbeira, Alvaro N and Castel, Stephane E and Kim-Hellmuth, Sarah and Park, YoSon and Scott, Alexandra J and Strober, Benjamin J and Brown, Christopher D and Wen, Xiaoquan and Hall, Ira M and Battle, Alexis and Lappalainen, Tuuli and Im, Hae Kyung and Ardlie, Kristin G and Mostafavi, Sara and Quertermous, Thomas and Kirkegaard, Karla and Montgomery, Stephen B} } @article {100, title = {On the cross-population generalizability of gene expression prediction models.}, journal = {PLoS Genet}, volume = {16}, year = {2020}, month = {2020 08}, pages = {e1008927}, abstract = {

The genetic control of gene expression is a core component of human physiology. For the past several years, transcriptome-wide association studies have leveraged large datasets of linked genotype and RNA sequencing information to create a powerful gene-based test of association that has been used in dozens of studies. While numerous discoveries have been made, the populations in the training data are overwhelmingly of European descent, and little is known about the generalizability of these models to other populations. Here, we test for cross-population generalizability of gene expression prediction models using a dataset of African American individuals with RNA-Seq data in whole blood. We find that the default models trained in large datasets such as GTEx and DGN fare poorly in African Americans, with a notable reduction in prediction accuracy when compared to European Americans. We replicate these limitations in cross-population generalizability using the five populations in the GEUVADIS dataset. Via realistic simulations of both populations and gene expression, we show that accurate cross-population generalizability of transcriptome prediction only arises when eQTL architecture is substantially shared across populations. In contrast, models with non-identical eQTLs showed patterns similar to real-world data. Therefore, generating RNA-Seq data in diverse populations is a critical step towards multi-ethnic utility of gene expression prediction.

}, keywords = {African Americans, Gene Expression Profiling, Genome-Wide Association Study, Humans, Models, Genetic, Quantitative Trait Loci, Reference Standards, RNA-Seq, Transcriptome}, issn = {1553-7404}, doi = {10.1371/journal.pgen.1008927}, author = {Keys, Kevin L and Mak, Angel C Y and White, Marquitta J and Eckalbar, Walter L and Dahl, Andrew W and Mefford, Joel and Mikhaylova, Anna V and Contreras, Mar{\'\i}a G and Elhawary, Jennifer R and Eng, Celeste and Hu, Donglei and Huntsman, Scott and Oh, Sam S and Salazar, Sandra and LeNoir, Michael A and Ye, Jimmie C and Thornton, Timothy A and Zaitlen, Noah and Burchard, Esteban G and Gignoux, Christopher R} } @article {74, title = {Identifying causal variants and genes using functional genomics in specialized cell types and contexts.}, journal = {Hum Genet}, volume = {139}, year = {2020}, month = {2020 Jan}, pages = {95-102}, abstract = {

A central goal in human genetics is the identification of variants and genes that influence the risk of polygenic diseases. In the past decade, genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have identified tens of thousands of genetic loci associated with various diseases. Since the majority of such loci lie within non-coding regions and have many candidate variants in linkage disequilibrium, it has been challenging to accurately identify specific causal variants and genes. To aid in their discovery a variety of statistical and experimental approaches have been developed. These approaches often borrow information from functional genomics assays such as ATAC-seq, ChIP-seq and RNA-seq to annotate functional variants and identify regulatory relationships between variants and genes. While such approaches are powerful, given the diversity of cell types and environments, it is paramount to select disease-relevant contexts for follow-up analyses. In this review, we discuss the latest developments, challenges, and best practices for determining the causal mechanisms of polygenic disease risk variants with functional genomics data from specialized cell types.

}, keywords = {Cell Lineage, Genes, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Genome, Human, Genome-Wide Association Study, Genomics, Humans, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Quantitative Trait Loci}, issn = {1432-1203}, doi = {10.1007/s00439-019-02044-2}, author = {Liu, Boxiang and Montgomery, Stephen B} } @article {124, title = {Modeling epistasis in mice and yeast using the proportion of two or more distinct genetic backgrounds: Evidence for "polygenic epistasis".}, journal = {PLoS Genet}, volume = {16}, year = {2020}, month = {2020 10}, pages = {e1009165}, abstract = {

BACKGROUND: The majority of quantitative genetic models used to map complex traits assume that alleles have similar effects across all individuals. Significant evidence suggests, however, that epistatic interactions modulate the impact of many alleles. Nevertheless, identifying epistatic interactions remains computationally and statistically challenging. In this work, we address some of these challenges by developing a statistical test for polygenic epistasis that determines whether the effect of an allele is altered by the global genetic ancestry proportion from distinct progenitors.

RESULTS: We applied our method to data from mice and yeast. For the mice, we observed 49 significant genotype-by-ancestry interaction associations across 14 phenotypes as well as over 1,400 Bonferroni-corrected genotype-by-ancestry interaction associations for mouse gene expression data. For the yeast, we observed 92 significant genotype-by-ancestry interactions across 38 phenotypes. Given this evidence of epistasis, we test for and observe evidence of rapid selection pressure on ancestry specific polymorphisms within one of the cohorts, consistent with epistatic selection.

CONCLUSIONS: Unlike our prior work in human populations, we observe widespread evidence of ancestry-modified SNP effects, perhaps reflecting the greater divergence present in crosses using mice and yeast.

}, keywords = {Alleles, Animals, Epistasis, Genetic, Evolution, Molecular, Genotype, Humans, Mice, Models, Genetic, Multifactorial Inheritance, Phenotype, Quantitative Trait Loci, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Selection, Genetic}, issn = {1553-7404}, doi = {10.1371/journal.pgen.1009165}, author = {Rau, Christoph D and Gonzales, Natalia M and Bloom, Joshua S and Park, Danny and Ayroles, Julien and Palmer, Abraham A and Lusis, Aldons J and Zaitlen, Noah} } @article {88, title = {Whole-Genome and RNA Sequencing Reveal Variation and Transcriptomic Coordination in the Developing Human Prefrontal Cortex.}, journal = {Cell Rep}, volume = {31}, year = {2020}, month = {2020 04 07}, pages = {107489}, abstract = {

Gene expression levels vary across developmental stage, cell type, and region in the brain. Genomic variants also contribute to the variation in expression, and some neuropsychiatric disorder loci may exert their effects through this mechanism. To investigate these relationships, we present BrainVar, a unique resource of paired whole-genome and bulk tissue RNA sequencing from the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex of 176 individuals across prenatal and postnatal development. Here we identify common variants that alter gene expression (expression quantitative trait loci [eQTLs]) constantly across development or predominantly during prenatal or postnatal stages. Both "constant" and "temporal-predominant" eQTLs are enriched for loci associated with neuropsychiatric traits and disorders and colocalize with specific variants. Expression levels of more than 12,000 genes rise or fall in a concerted late-fetal transition, with the transitional genes enriched for cell-type-specific genes and neuropsychiatric risk loci, underscoring the importance of cataloging developmental trajectories in understanding cortical physiology and pathology.

}, keywords = {Base Sequence, Brain, Computational Biology, Databases, Genetic, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Genetic Variation, Genome-Wide Association Study, Genomics, Humans, Phenotype, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Prefrontal Cortex, Quantitative Trait Loci, Sequence Analysis, RNA, Transcriptome, Whole Exome Sequencing, Whole Genome Sequencing}, issn = {2211-1247}, doi = {10.1016/j.celrep.2020.03.053}, author = {Werling, Donna M and Pochareddy, Sirisha and Choi, Jinmyung and An, Joon-Yong and Sheppard, Brooke and Peng, Minshi and Li, Zhen and Dastmalchi, Claudia and Santpere, Gabriel and Sousa, Andr{\'e} M M and Tebbenkamp, Andrew T N and Kaur, Navjot and Gulden, Forrest O and Breen, Michael S and Liang, Lindsay and Gilson, Michael C and Zhao, Xuefang and Dong, Shan and Klei, Lambertus and Cicek, A Ercument and Buxbaum, Joseph D and Adle-Biassette, Homa and Thomas, Jean-Leon and Aldinger, Kimberly A and O{\textquoteright}Day, Diana R and Glass, Ian A and Zaitlen, Noah A and Talkowski, Michael E and Roeder, Kathryn and State, Matthew W and Devlin, Bernie and Sanders, Stephan J and Sestan, Nenad} } @article {59, title = {Adjusting for Principal Components of Molecular Phenotypes Induces Replicating False Positives.}, journal = {Genetics}, volume = {211}, year = {2019}, month = {2019 04}, pages = {1179-1189}, abstract = {

High-throughput measurements of molecular phenotypes provide an unprecedented opportunity to model cellular processes and their impact on disease. These highly structured datasets are usually strongly confounded, creating false positives and reducing power. This has motivated many approaches based on principal components analysis (PCA) to estimate and correct for confounders, which have become indispensable elements of association tests between molecular phenotypes and both genetic and nongenetic factors. Here, we show that these correction approaches induce a bias, and that it persists for large sample sizes and replicates out-of-sample. We prove this theoretically for PCA by deriving an analytic, deterministic, and intuitive bias approximation. We assess other methods with realistic simulations, which show that perturbing any of several basic parameters can cause false positive rate (FPR) inflation. Our experiments show the bias depends on covariate and confounder sparsity, effect sizes, and their correlation. Surprisingly, when the covariate and confounder have [Formula: see text], standard two-step methods all have [Formula: see text]-fold FPR inflation. Our analysis informs best practices for confounder correction in genomic studies, and suggests many false discoveries have been made and replicated in some differential expression analyses.

}, keywords = {Animals, Genome-Wide Association Study, Humans, Models, Genetic, Phenotype, Principal Component Analysis, Quantitative Trait Loci, Reproducibility of Results}, issn = {1943-2631}, doi = {10.1534/genetics.118.301768}, author = {Dahl, Andy and Guillemot, Vincent and Mefford, Joel and Aschard, Hugues and Zaitlen, Noah} } @article {57, title = {Opportunities and challenges for transcriptome-wide association studies.}, journal = {Nat Genet}, volume = {51}, year = {2019}, month = {2019 04}, pages = {592-599}, abstract = {

Transcriptome-wide association studies (TWAS) integrate genome-wide association studies (GWAS) and gene expression datasets to identify gene-trait associations. In this Perspective, we explore properties of TWAS as a potential approach to prioritize causal genes at GWAS loci, by using simulations and case studies of literature-curated candidate causal genes for schizophrenia, low-density-lipoprotein cholesterol and Crohn{\textquoteright}s disease. We explore risk loci where TWAS accurately prioritizes the likely causal gene as well as loci where TWAS prioritizes multiple genes, some likely to be non-causal, owing to sharing of expression quantitative trait loci (eQTL). TWAS is especially prone to spurious prioritization with expression data from non-trait-related tissues or cell types, owing to substantial cross-cell-type variation in expression levels and eQTL strengths. Nonetheless, TWAS prioritizes candidate causal genes more accurately than simple baselines. We suggest best practices for causal-gene prioritization with TWAS and discuss future opportunities for improvement. Our results showcase the strengths and limitations of using eQTL datasets to determine causal genes at GWAS loci.

}, keywords = {Crohn Disease, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Genetic Variation, Genome-Wide Association Study, Humans, Lipoproteins, LDL, Quantitative Trait Loci, Schizophrenia, Transcriptome}, issn = {1546-1718}, doi = {10.1038/s41588-019-0385-z}, author = {Wainberg, Michael and Sinnott-Armstrong, Nasa and Mancuso, Nicholas and Barbeira, Alvaro N and Knowles, David A and Golan, David and Ermel, Raili and Ruusalepp, Arno and Quertermous, Thomas and Hao, Ke and Bj{\"o}rkegren, Johan L M and Im, Hae Kyung and Pasaniuc, Bogdan and Rivas, Manuel A and Kundaje, Anshul} } @article {44, title = {Fine-mapping and functional studies highlight potential causal variants for rheumatoid arthritis and type 1 diabetes.}, journal = {Nat Genet}, volume = {50}, year = {2018}, month = {2018 Oct}, pages = {1366-1374}, abstract = {

To define potentially causal variants for autoimmune disease, we fine-mapped 76 rheumatoid arthritis (11,475 cases, 15,870 controls) and type 1 diabetes loci (9,334 cases, 11,111 controls). After sequencing 799 1-kilobase regulatory (H3K4me3) regions within these loci in 568 individuals, we observed accurate imputation for 89\% of common variants. We defined credible sets of <=5 causal variants at 5 rheumatoid arthritis and 10 type 1 diabetes loci. We identified potentially causal missense variants at DNASE1L3, PTPN22, SH2B3, and TYK2, and noncoding variants at MEG3, CD28-CTLA4, and IL2RA. We also identified potential candidate causal variants at SIRPG and TNFAIP3. Using functional assays, we confirmed allele-specific protein binding and differential enhancer activity for three variants: the CD28-CTLA4 rs117701653 SNP, MEG3 rs34552516 indel, and TNFAIP3 rs35926684 indel.

}, keywords = {Alleles, Arthritis, Rheumatoid, Case-Control Studies, CD28 Antigens, Chromosome Mapping, CTLA-4 Antigen, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Gene Frequency, Genetic Loci, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Genome-Wide Association Study, Humans, Jurkat Cells, Mutation, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Quantitative Trait Loci, RNA, Long Noncoding, Tumor Necrosis Factor alpha-Induced Protein 3}, issn = {1546-1718}, doi = {10.1038/s41588-018-0216-7}, author = {Westra, Harm-Jan and Mart{\'\i}nez-Bonet, Marta and Onengut-Gumuscu, Suna and Lee, Annette and Luo, Yang and Teslovich, Nikola and Worthington, Jane and Martin, Javier and Huizinga, Tom and Klareskog, Lars and Rantapaa-Dahlqvist, Solbritt and Chen, Wei-Min and Quinlan, Aaron and Todd, John A and Eyre, Steve and Nigrovic, Peter A and Gregersen, Peter K and Rich, Stephen S and Raychaudhuri, Soumya} } @article {18, title = {Genetic effects on gene expression across human tissues.}, journal = {Nature}, volume = {550}, year = {2017}, month = {2017 Oct 11}, pages = {204-213}, abstract = {

Characterization of the molecular function of the human genome and its variation across individuals is essential for identifying the cellular mechanisms that underlie human genetic traits and diseases. The Genotype-Tissue Expression (GTEx) project aims to characterize variation in gene expression levels across individuals and diverse tissues of the human body, many of which are not easily accessible. Here we describe genetic effects on gene expression levels across 44 human tissues. We find that local genetic variation affects gene expression levels for the majority of genes, and we further identify inter-chromosomal genetic effects for 93 genes and 112 loci. On the basis of the identified genetic effects, we characterize patterns of tissue specificity, compare local and distal effects, and evaluate the functional properties of the genetic effects. We also demonstrate that multi-tissue, multi-individual data can be used to identify genes and pathways affected by human disease-associated variation, enabling a mechanistic interpretation of gene regulation and the genetic basis of disease.

}, keywords = {Alleles, Chromosomes, Human, Disease, Female, Gene Expression Profiling, Gene Expression Regulation, Genetic Variation, Genome, Human, Genotype, Humans, Male, Organ Specificity, Quantitative Trait Loci}, issn = {1476-4687}, doi = {10.1038/nature24277}, author = {Battle, Alexis and Brown, Christopher D and Engelhardt, Barbara E and Montgomery, Stephen B} } @article {8, title = {Limited statistical evidence for shared genetic effects of eQTLs and autoimmune-disease-associated loci in three major immune-cell types.}, journal = {Nat Genet}, volume = {49}, year = {2017}, month = {2017 Apr}, pages = {600-605}, abstract = {

Most autoimmune-disease-risk effects identified by genome-wide association studies (GWAS) localize to open chromatin with gene-regulatory activity. GWAS loci are also enriched in expression quantitative trait loci (eQTLs), thus suggesting that most risk variants alter gene expression. However, because causal variants are difficult to identify, and cis-eQTLs occur frequently, it remains challenging to identify specific instances of disease-relevant changes to gene regulation. Here, we used a novel joint likelihood framework with higher resolution than that of previous methods to identify loci where autoimmune-disease risk and an eQTL are driven by a single shared genetic effect. Using eQTLs from three major immune subpopulations, we found shared effects in only \~{}25\% of the loci examined. Thus, we show that a fraction of gene-regulatory changes suggest strong mechanistic hypotheses for disease risk, but we conclude that most risk mechanisms are not likely to involve changes in basal gene expression.

}, keywords = {Autoimmune Diseases, Gene Expression, Gene Regulatory Networks, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Genome-Wide Association Study, Humans, Immunity, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Quantitative Trait Loci}, issn = {1546-1718}, doi = {10.1038/ng.3795}, author = {Chun, Sung and Casparino, Alexandra and Patsopoulos, Nikolaos A and Croteau-Chonka, Damien C and Raby, Benjamin A and De Jager, Philip L and Sunyaev, Shamil R and Cotsapas, Chris} } @article {9, title = {Population- and individual-specific regulatory variation in Sardinia.}, journal = {Nat Genet}, volume = {49}, year = {2017}, month = {2017 May}, pages = {700-707}, abstract = {

Genetic studies of complex traits have mainly identified associations with noncoding variants. To further determine the contribution of regulatory variation, we combined whole-genome and transcriptome data for 624 individuals from Sardinia to identify common and rare variants that influence gene expression and splicing. We identified 21,183 expression quantitative trait loci (eQTLs) and 6,768 splicing quantitative trait loci (sQTLs), including 619 new QTLs. We identified high-frequency QTLs and found evidence of selection near genes involved in malarial resistance and increased multiple sclerosis risk, reflecting the epidemiological history of Sardinia. Using family relationships, we identified 809 segregating expression outliers (median z score of 2.97), averaging 13.3 genes per individual. Outlier genes were enriched for proximal rare variants, providing a new approach to study large-effect regulatory variants and their relevance to traits. Our results provide insight into the effects of regulatory variants and their relationship to population history and individual genetic risk.

}, keywords = {Alternative Splicing, Chromosome Mapping, Family Health, Female, Gene Expression Profiling, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Genetic Variation, Genetics, Population, Genome-Wide Association Study, Genotype, Humans, Italy, Male, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Quantitative Trait Loci, Transcription Initiation Site}, issn = {1546-1718}, doi = {10.1038/ng.3840}, author = {Pala, Mauro and Zappala, Zachary and Marongiu, Mara and Li, Xin and Davis, Joe R and Cusano, Roberto and Crobu, Francesca and Kukurba, Kimberly R and Gloudemans, Michael J and Reinier, Frederic and Berutti, Riccardo and Piras, Maria G and Mulas, Antonella and Zoledziewska, Magdalena and Marongiu, Michele and Sorokin, Elena P and Hess, Gaelen T and Smith, Kevin S and Busonero, Fabio and Maschio, Andrea and Steri, Maristella and Sidore, Carlo and Sanna, Serena and Fiorillo, Edoardo and Bassik, Michael C and Sawcer, Stephen J and Battle, Alexis and Novembre, John and Jones, Chris and Angius, Andrea and Abecasis, Gon{\c c}alo R and Schlessinger, David and Cucca, Francesco and Montgomery, Stephen B} }