@article {134,
	title = {Regulatory genomic circuitry of human disease loci by integrative epigenomics.},
	journal = {Nature},
	volume = {590},
	year = {2021},
	month = {2021 02},
	pages = {300-307},
	abstract = {<p>Annotating the molecular basis of human disease remains an unsolved challenge, as 93\% of disease loci are non-coding and gene-regulatory annotations are highly incomplete. Here we present EpiMap, a compendium comprising 10,000~epigenomic maps across 800~samples, which we used to define chromatin states, high-resolution enhancers, enhancer modules, upstream regulators and downstream target genes. We used this resource to annotate 30,000~genetic loci that were associated with 540~traits, predicting trait-relevant tissues, putative causal nucleotide variants in enriched tissue enhancers and candidate tissue-specific target genes for each. We partitioned multifactorial traits into tissue-specific contributing factors with distinct functional enrichments and disease comorbidity patterns, and revealed both single-factor monotropic and multifactor pleiotropic loci. Top-scoring loci frequently had multiple predicted driver variants, converging through multiple enhancers with a common target gene, multiple genes in common tissues, or multiple genes and multiple tissues, indicating extensive pleiotropy. Our results demonstrate the importance of dense, rich, high-resolution epigenomic annotations for the investigation of complex traits.</p>},
	keywords = {Chromatin, Disease, Enhancer Elements, Genetic, Epigenesis, Genetic, Epigenomics, Female, Gene Regulatory Networks, Genetic Loci, Genome-Wide Association Study, Humans, Male, Multifactorial Inheritance, Organ Specificity, Reproducibility of Results},
	issn = {1476-4687},
	doi = {10.1038/s41586-020-03145-z},
	author = {Boix, Carles A and James, Benjamin T and Park, Yongjin P and Meuleman, Wouter and Kellis, Manolis}
}
@article {16,
	title = {Testing for the indirect effect under the null for genome-wide mediation analyses.},
	journal = {Genet Epidemiol},
	volume = {41},
	year = {2017},
	month = {2017 Dec},
	pages = {824-833},
	abstract = {<p>Mediation analysis helps researchers assess whether part or all of an exposure{\textquoteright}s effect on an outcome is due to an intermediate variable. The indirect effect can help in designing interventions on the mediator as opposed to the exposure and better understanding the outcome{\textquoteright}s mechanisms. Mediation analysis has seen increased use in genome-wide epidemiological studies to test for an exposure of interest being mediated through a genomic measure such as gene expression or DNA methylation (DNAm). Testing for the indirect effect is challenged by the fact that the null hypothesis is composite. We examined the performance of commonly used mediation testing methods for the indirect effect in genome-wide mediation studies. When there is no association between the exposure and the mediator and no association between the mediator and the outcome, we show that these common tests are overly conservative. This is a case that will arise frequently in genome-wide mediation studies. Caution is hence needed when applying the commonly used mediation tests in genome-wide mediation studies. We evaluated the performance of these methods using simulation studies, and performed an epigenome-wide mediation association study in the Normative Aging Study, analyzing DNAm as a mediator of the effect of pack-years on FEV .</p>},
	keywords = {Basic Helix-Loop-Helix Transcription Factors, DNA Methylation, Epigenomics, Genome-Wide Association Study, Humans, Lung Neoplasms, Models, Genetic, Repressor Proteins},
	issn = {1098-2272},
	doi = {10.1002/gepi.22084},
	author = {Barfield, Richard and Shen, Jincheng and Just, Allan C and Vokonas, Pantel S and Schwartz, Joel and Baccarelli, Andrea A and VanderWeele, Tyler J and Lin, Xihong}
}
